Week 16 — Year of Short Stories 2026

2026 is another year of short stories. In this weekly series, I track my short story writing, from idea and draft to submission.

This is the week of Apr. 20-26.

Stats

• Stories Finished: 2
• Submissions Currently Out: 6
• Submissions Total: 15
• Rejections: 13
• Acceptances: 0

Goals and Results

Last week’s goals:

1. Revise F-TIB.
2. Write Arbor Grove.
3. More critiques.

The stories that were out remain out. I received no responses and sent no new submissions. Critiques are going well and I’m comfortably ahead again.

I continue to make progress on Arbor Grove, although the middle has been muddier and slower than I would like, and as a result I am still a few days behind on my word count. It feels like it’s going to need some trimming when it’s done.

Despite putting F-TIB at top priority last week, I didn’t actually work on revisions that much. I did ruminate on changes and parts that don’t quite feel right, but that doesn’t tend to feel as productive as fingers-on-keyboard work, even if it is sometimes a necessary step of the process.

Next Week

Beneath the House in Caen goes out for critique at the end of April. In order to try to make good progress on F-TIB before I have another story to revise, I’m going to make it my singular priority for the week.

Goals for next week:

1. Revise F-TIB.

Changing Things Up

Shocking as it is, we’re approaching the 1/3 mark for the year of 2026.

In writing the most recent update or two, I’ve begun to feel that these posts are becoming a little too rote. Rather than continuing to bore everyone, I thought it might be time for a change.

My reason for this series is partly to improve my habit of regular writing. Repetition develops habits, but it also breeds complacency. With that in mind, I’m going to try something new. Going forward, I’ll try to find a mini-topic of the week that relates to whatever I’ve been writing. I’ll still have the stats and goals to keep me motivated, but this bonus topic should give us some variety.

This Week’s Mini-Topic: Exploratory Writing

I’ve discussed exploratory writing before, and while I don’t begrudge writers who like to find their story as they write it, I’ve never considered myself one of them. It still makes me slightly nauseous to think about writing a novel without having a firm outline.

For the writers who insist this is the way they have to write, dead-ends, plot-holes, and heavy revisions are the cost of doing business. It just galls me to think about potentially throwing away whole chapters when something doesn’t work.

Admittedly, having an outline doesn’t guarantee that a scene or section will work. Planners can miss plot holes, and scenes can look good in summary only to die on the page. Still, outlining lets me feel that I have a fighting chance to catch a wide spectrum of issues up front, before I’ve wasted my precious time.

Only, that’s not entirely true anymore.

I’ve slowly come around to accepting (and maybe even enjoying) exploratory writing for short stories. The shorter I think the story should be, the happier I am to jump into it blind. This makes some sense, because I generally don’t outline short stories in the same way I would outline a novel. When a story is under three thousand words, a major rewrite doesn’t feel quite so unreasonable.

I also find that short stories, more than longer work, can run on an engine of mood, style, or a unique viewpoint. Plot can be less of a concern in a short story, even if I remain firmly against “plotless” fiction.

I draw the line at endings though. I might find a better ending than I thought, but I still don’t like to start a story without having some idea of how it could end. That’s just crazy talk.