Week 24 & 25 — Year of Short Stories 2026

2026 is another year of short stories. In this weekly series, I track my short story writing, from idea and draft to submission.

This is the weeks of Jun 15 – Jun 28.

Stats

  • Stories Finished: 2
  • Submissions Currently Out: 5
  • Submissions Total: 22
  • Rejections: 19
  • Acceptances: 0

Submissions and Responses

Two submissions came back to me over this two-week period.

One was for The Incident at Pleasant Hills, and was a very pleasant personalized rejection that said several nice things about the story before the usual “we get 1000 submissions each submission period and only have 10 slots” let-down. The one piece of feedback was that the beginning was too slow, so I might review the story and see if there’s anything I can tighten up next time I send it out.

The other response was an honorable mention in the Writers of the Future contest for my story, Red Eye. This is the second time I’ve submitted, and the second honorable mention I’ve received. So that’s something.

I do not know how many submissions they receive for their quarterly contests, but I am sure that a paying contest with no submission fee receives quite a few. They have a multi-tiered system: honorable mentions, “silver” honorable mentions, finalists, and 1st/2nd/3rd place. Judging by Duotrope stats, I would guess that something like 10-20% of entrants fall into all those categories. So I’d say an honorable mention is about on par with a tier 2 rejection from a paying publication. More or less.

I still narrowly meet their “new writer” criteria, so I’ll likely send more stories their way as long as I am able. Being an L. Ron Hubbard joint, they are at least nominally associated with Scientology, something I am certainly not a fan of. But all that Tom Cruise money pays for a free contest with good prizes. I figure the cult cash might as well go to me, rather than all the other shady things they get up to.

Goals and Results

Last time, my goals were:

  1. Finish T.I.M. (Formerly F-TIB)
  2. Start working on Beneath the House in Caen revisions.

I “finished” T.I.M., clocking a little over 2,000 more words, and bringing the total to 6,000. That’s a significant bump from the original 2,300-word story. It’s also not surprising since it went from 5-ish nebulous short scenes to eleven. It still needs significant cleanup, and maybe another Critters run, and will hopefully shed words along the way. However, for the moment I am happy to let it rest.

Meanwhile, I collected all the Critters feedback for Beneath the House in Caen into a single document and started creating a bullet list of things to work on.

I have to say, there are a lot of things I like about Critters, and the fact that Andrew Burt keeps the enterprise going year after year when he undoubtedly loses money on it makes him a saint among writers. But dear God, the website and the email infrastructure feel like they are from the 90s, and the critique emails come in with bizarre formatting. Every time I submit a story, I think about creating some scripts reformat the critiques for readability. Maybe I’ll get around to that some day.

Beneath the House in Caen feels to me like a story that needs much less work than T.I.M., and I think the feedback bears that out. I’ll try to bounce back and forth between this and T.I.M. over the next week and see what I can get done.

Next Week

My goals for next week are flip-flopped versions of the previous weeks:

  1. Revise Beneath the House in Caen to completion, or close to it.
  2. Clean up and trim T.I.M., consider whether it needs another round of Critters.

Next week will be Week 26—the halfway mark of this Year of Short Stories. I plan to review my goals and see how they compare to my current progress. Spoiler: I’m a bit behind. However, I’m not that far behind, so I suspect I picked my goals well. More on that next week.

Unknown's avatar

Author: Samuel Johnston

Professional software developer, unprofessional writer, and generally interested in almost everything.

5 thoughts on “Week 24 & 25 — Year of Short Stories 2026”

  1. I work for Writers of the Future. Your comments about the contest are a little insulting and discriminatory. The contest is funded by the Hubbard estate from the royalties from the sales of the books (for the past 4+ decades), which is why we try to sell as many of the Writers of the Future anthologies as possible. AKA paying-it-forward. Please do better.

    And yes, we receive thousands of entries per quarter.

    Like

    1. Thank you for your comment, Emily.

      Let me be clear. The Writers of the Future Contest is a fantastic opportunity for aspiring authors, and valuable contribution to the SFF community. There are many fantastic authors and editors involved, and I firmly believe that the vast majority are probably involved only to improve the community, encourage new writers, and pay-it-forward, as you say.

      Let me also be clear that Scientology is a scammy, abusive, cult-like organization that promulgates an objectively fake religion and has a well-documented history of immoral action, convicted criminal activity, and weaponization of the legal system to silence critics. It is a foul group, and deserving of insults.

      L. Ron Hubbard is the founder of Scientology, and the various legal entities of his “estate” are all owned or deeply entangled with the organization. To suggest that the contest is utterly divorced from Scientology is about as believable as suggesting a contest funded by Jesuits and called The Jesus H. Christ Writers of the Future Contest could be completely unrelated to Christianity. It strains incredulity.

      I will also note that you commented fairly quickly after this post went up (as though from an automated alert). You are using a throwaway account linked to a dead domain, with a username that appears nowhere else on the internet. I’ll leave the possible implications of that as an exercise for the reader…

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Samuel, I’m not a bot if that is what you are inferring. I found you on a Google search looking for a blog from one of my authors this morning. I don’t usually engage, but here we are. I also did not imply the contest is not connected. If you feel that strongly, you should not enter the contest. You’d meet me if you win, I run the contest, and we seem to have hit it off to a great start…

        Like

      2. I’m happy to know you’re not a bot, and I’ll back off my admittedly adversarial tone. The first paragraph of my response was not to be taken as sarcastic. I don’t doubt that you and the others working on the contest are in it to elevate new voices in SFF.

        I can put myself in your shoes and imagine the irritation you might feel, reading offhanded remarks that come across as an insult to your work.

        Hopefully you can likewise imagine how odd it would feel to be a small-time blogger who offhandedly mentions the contest “nominally associated with Scientology” and makes the same Tom Cruise joke people have been making for two decades, only to have the *director* of said contest swoop in and call me “discriminatory” and “insulting.” I suppose I found it unlikely that you would take the time and be so offended by mention of the connection we both seem to agree on.

        Whether or not I submit to the contest again, I wish you well, and I hope the contest continues to be a boon to writers in my favorite genres.

        Liked by 1 person

      3. Thank you and like I said, I don’t usually engage. But for whatever reason, I saw your blog and was all happy for you with your HMs…then came a dump. At this point we are cool. I wish you the best with your writing.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment