The Short Story Series
- Why Write Short Stories?
- Why Read Short Stories?
- Short Story Categorization
- Revising Short Stories
- Submitting Short Stories
It’s the ultimate crossover event! Today we have a continuation of my short story series, as well as my Reference Desk series detailing useful tools for writers. Get ready for a battle of publication catalogues and a submission tracker showdown!
Finding the right place to submit your short fiction isn’t trivial. Back in the olden days, you might have to subscribe to an actual dead-tree trade journal just to have a somewhat up-to-date list of publications. These days, the internet gives us some easier options.
The two most popular submission tools for short fiction writers are Duotrope and Submission Grinder. Both of them are designed to help you find markets for your stories and track your submissions. Today, I’ll be comparing some of the different features between these two tools to give you a better idea of which one you might want to use.
Let’s get this out of the way up front. Duotrope is a paid service. After a 7-day free trial, it costs $5/month or $50/year. Submission Grinder is completely free to use, although they have numerous options to donate.
If you don’t want to pay or can’t afford it, Submission Grinder is the tool for you.
Duotrope maintains listings of publishers of fiction, non-fiction, poetry and visual art. It also lists literary agents for fiction writers. Submission Grinder maintains fiction and poetry listings.
At the time of writing, Duotrope lists 5,027 fiction markets. They claim that they keep their listings accurate and up-to-date by checking each active listing for changes about once a month. They also run more thorough check twice a year, contacting the editors or agents if anything appears to be inaccurate or if there are signs that the market may be dead or on hiatus. (Websites not being updated is honestly a pretty big problem with small markets.)
At the time of writing, the Submission Grinder has 2,669 listings for fiction and poetry. It’s not entirely clear from the webpage how the listings are kept updated, although there are links for users to suggest a new market listing or suggest a correction, so it seems to be mostly crowdsourced.
Both tools let you
- Add stories to your tracker
- Add submissions for a story
- Mark a submission as accepted, rejected, or no response
- Track and search personal statistics
- Track deadlines
Both tools also aggregate the statistics across their user base. This allows them to show information like what percentage of submissions are accepted or rejected by a specific market. They both have anonymized feeds of recent activity.
Duotrope has a plethora of statistics*, including the markets that are fastest and slowest to respond, and those that are most or least likely to accept (or even respond!)
*Note: you can see the list, but not the actual statistics, without a subscription
- Both tools have an optional newsletter with new listings and other publishing news.
- Duotrope has transcripts from hundreds of editor and literary agent interviews—possibly useful for getting a better idea of what your favorite market is looking for, or just general good practices.
- Duotrope has some basic guides for writers, especially around submitting your work. It also has guides to using their various tools.
Honestly, both of these tools get the job done. They make it easy to search a lot of different markets, and to track your submissions as you send them out.
Overall, I do find Duotrope to be a little bit nicer. It has a few more features and a little more polish, but that’s to be expected when they have a subscription fee. If you don’t mind spending the money, I think Duotrope is good value for the cost.
Submission Grinder feels a little more like a community project, crowdsourcing market info and relying on donations. Maintaining a popular tool site takes work, and based on their Patreon, I think Submission Grinder is powered more by love than money.
If you have a story or two that you’re looking to send out, you should definitely try out one of these services. It will make it a lot easier to find ideal markets and keep track of what gets sent where.
4 thoughts on “Reference Desk #15 — Duotrope vs. Submission Grinder”
I’ve been using Duotrope a lot this year. The hubster got me a year’s subscription as a gift last Christmas.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Honorable mention goes to discover.submittable.com. I have not personally used it, so I can’t really give it a proper review, but it has quite a few entries for magazines, anthologies and contests.
LikeLiked by 1 person